This New York Times is pushing for hatred

Dating is hard

The New New New New New New New New New The Withing to Withing to Withing to Withing Ta’s Trouble, Jean Garnett believes that the trouble of wanting a man is… men.

Like, everyone.

It is part of a nasty piece of thought that is part of a gender war that integrates heterosexual love and history and completely keeps women from having any agency or responsibility in relationships.

There is no accountability or introspection, just a big diagnosis that men are a problem from deciding to pursue open relationships, casual sex and women in the middle age.

It is a sad, morbid thing about the millennium of “Sex and the City”, which further demonstrates the true degree of the prospect of modern romance.

The work is mainly an autobiographical sexual navel, which believes that many women are experiencing “heterosexuality,” a term borrowed by Garnett from Upenn Academic Asa Seresin, which describes straight men and women “woes tired of men’s mating behavior.”

This is a misunderstood word. Garnett’s own heterosexuals show lament with a female friend that they can’t be just homosexual to each other and declare “men are rotten in an upright state.”

It also raised its head when she walked past a couple, approaching each other near outside the subway, and heard the gag of her mouth.

What made this woman so hurt, so painful, so…heterosexual?

Well, her date was colorful, please be friendly.

Garnett reveals her Open The marriage broke down because she “falls in love with another man” and actually, “overturns the entire structure [her] A man’s life” – tell her from the beginning “he doesn’t know how to do a relationship”. “Ah, yes, classic.

Later, she revealed that she sometimes dates the man, and that the man is more than just a sexual relationship.

She also narrated the actual adult male she dated, reading: “I’m really looking forward to seeing you again, but today I’ll experience some intense anxiety and need a low position:(.”

Apparently, it was a common experience in her friends group, who laughed at brunch and said “men can’t’ [expletive] us. ‘” Garnett asked, “Where are those who can handle the hard stuff?” Do you like to leave the house for sex? ”

She suggests it’s a character in “Sex and the City” – but what about “he just doesn’t like you”?

Who are the people she is talking about? For all the complaints I made from friends about their dating life, men didn’t show up for sex.

Hybridism is just one of many academic terms cited by Garnett. We also know about complementary twins, normative males, emotional labor, etc.

The beautiful words and quotes allowed her to hide behind an academic look and avoid analyzing whether her choices were actually what made her so painful.

“I wrote in a rare sense of self: “I experienced the desire for a struggle that someone must lose. ”

But this is the problem. We are not achieving gender war through our love life.

What Garnett consciously discovered was that constructing the problem as a situation of American objection allowed her to remove the “i” from the equation.

But, guess what? And pursue the person who gives you yellow lights. And indulge in the romantic death trap of non-marriage.

Stop blaming everyone else, figure out your life, and get some agents.

Modern dating has a lot of trouble – from connecting culture to situations, dating apps to ghosts. A platform for women to struggle should be given.

But media like Times seem to be amplifying the voices of the most painful and dysfunctional people who bring their pain to themselves and distract the actual problems at hand.

Such works prevent us from solving the problems that plague modern love more closely. They make readers want to shake the writer and say, “Catch one.”

Is the problem everyone? Or the problem way Some women choose to build relationships with men?