Why is the jealous husband’s theory a direct “garbage”

On the other hand, another title reminds us how far we must go.

Publish Economic magazine In the second half of last year, he claimed that the salary made by his wife exceeded her husband, which increased his unfortunate possibility.

It shows to us that even in a relatively equal society, traditional gender characters are still shaping our interpersonal relationships, and they usually shape our interpersonal relationships in a harmful way.

When the study was located in Sweden, it pointed out a deeper systemic problem.

This BS system gender discrimination must be stopped. Women’s prosperity will destroy the stability of marriage or threatening the mental health of men is insulting, and frankly, danger. It enhances the concept of men’s development of outdated gender roles, and suggested that women should make their light dim to maintain peace.

This kind of remarks are also concentrated in the dynamics of the husband and wife, strengthening the framework of the alien, ignoring or eliminating the experience of same -sex couples or non -traditional partnerships.

The real problem is not the success of women, but outdated gender characters

These studies need to be summoned: the return nonsense is covered in academic terms.

They have strengthened a toxic narrative, and this narrative has existed for too long. All this is deeply rooted and what should be for men and women. The man was told that his value was related to the wallet. The woman was told to reach out to get the star (premise that their success would not make the Trad Static Quo feel uneasy), and the non -configuration dynamics were completely ignored. They strengthened a dangerous cultural narrative that made women unwilling to step into their own strength.

The ten -year study conducted by the National University of Australia shows that women who surpass male partners or spouses are likely to be 35 % of family violence. This is a terrible statistics. Financial independence should give women power-provides them with more security, rather than making them facing greater risks.

This is not just a woman’s problem. This is a systematic problem that will directly oppose the harmony in the relationship with financial independence.

Consequence? Women should work hard to deal with an impossible choice: shrinking to maintain a harmony or face the social impact of better partners.

Both options are acceptable.

This narrative hurts everyone. I believe that a person’s value is determined by his salary, which exacerbates mental health problems, and the pressure and even the relationship are broken. All these are unrealisticly expected by -products, also a harmful script about male temperament, and the meaning of becoming a “provider”, the meaning of “supporters”, or simply partners.

We should all get financial freedom

Women’s entry into power is not a threat. Success, no matter who achieves this goal, or in which type of relationship is not a threat. No one should shrink themselves, refuse to have the opportunity or underestimate their work to adapt to the feelings of others. Success is to build a stronger partnership, family and communities opportunities. If this concept shocks your world view, then it is good. Growth is always unwell.

Financial authorization is not just income. This is about independence, security and equality. It enables people to leave toxicity freely, create opportunities for themselves and their families, and build wealth in accordance with their own conditions.

Strong partnerships are based on mutual respect and common responsibilities. If a marriage or partnership is more income, it will not weaken the strength of another person, it will enhance the two of them.

How do we rewrite this narrative?

Demolition of these harmful views will not happen overnight, but this is where we can start:

1. It has nothing to do with teaching self -worth and income

This belief started early. Boys and girls are informed of different stories about success, rather than binary or Queer children are usually completely excluded from these narratives.

We need to change this narrative by showing their value to children, and independent of their ability to make money. Schools, media and families can show various partnership models, teach children to respect and collaborate rather than grow up in competition.

2. Promote partnerships, not power struggle

Often, the differences in income are competitive rather than neutral facts. This mentality poisoning relationship becomes the root cause of conflict rather than power.

The strong partnership is concentrated in common goals, open communication and evaluate everyone’s unique contribution-finance or other aspects. This requires a continuous dialogue between partners on its values, priority and dreams.

It’s time to develop both people who can be booming without feeling the shadow of the shadow.

3. Demand system changes

The burden of demolishing these harmful narratives should not fall on individuals. The workplace, industry and policy makers are responsible for creating an environment where equality can flourish.

Employers need to solve the gap between gender salary, implement false childcare policies to support families, and cultivate workplace culture that pays attention to diversified leadership. Leaders need to realize that financial independence is not zero -sum game, but supports all individuals, regardless of sex or relationships, can achieve this goal.

Let us change the conversation

Cultural change begins with how we talk about success and interpersonal relationships. When we hear the narrative as a threat, we need to shrink back. When the contribution of any type of partnership (whether it is financially, emotional or domestic) is considered inequality or unilateral contribution, we need to ask why.

Each dialogue that will be successful and equal partnerships disappears in these harmful views. Therefore, let us continue to have them-loud and more frequent.